This is rubbish, outlandish innuendo and utter nonsense. I
want to scream so, that people may take note. My Blog readers are only a few so
this post will not reach out and only the few who read this may take note. The
only way to reach this bizarre observation of Ms. Arundati Roy to the notice of
many is to highlight this in Twitter and Facebook so the spiraling information
gets moving afar. Also I’m further convinced that one should always be
skeptical before being judgmental, be it even the commandments from the good
Lord himself.
Arundati Roy, is a person whose views, analytic opinions
and articulation that has impressed me. Her book, “The Shape of the Beast” and
her many writings , foremost being the essays, “Walking with the Comrades”, and
the well balanced piece on the Parliament attack and sentencing of Afzal Guru.
Her acumen in distancing from the Anna Hazare fanfare was well justified, to me
in hindsight. But she foresaw and that is one of her special ability. Her
novelette though not a great creation ringed bell for me as it was moored in
the times I grew up and many scenes she poetically wrote in prose brought back
instances from my childhood days. I could empathize with a person who was my
age and grew up in the same social times.
Now after listening to a video lecture she gave in the USA,
I feel angered and revolted by her callous, ill-informed and untruthful
comments on certain incidences in India’s early post independent days. Her
erudition and the information that percolates to her repository have either
deserted her or she chose to go into an India bashing offensive -playing to the
gallery. In the bargain it may have done much harm to the country and how India
is perceived in the West. (The video link is given here and I would suggest
that people listen to the portion in question, which is in the very beginning
of the video).
Ms.Arundati Roy alleges that India is a Corporate Hindu
State that has been perpetually at war with its own people, starting from the
moment she gained independence- the Muslims in Hyderabad and Kashmir, the
Christians in Goa, the natives of the North-East and recently with the Sikhs in
Punjab. She claims that the Indian Army has been perpetually waging war against
her own people.
This is utter nonsense and at total variance to history and
facts. Yes in the central heartlands of India, now there is an ugly bourgeois
war against the indigenous people – the tribes, and blessed by big businesses
who want to eliminate or dispossess the tribal once and for all so that the
rich and untapped natural resources can be exploited. But what has the Indian action
against the Portuguese in Goa, against the belligerent Nizam in Hyderabad and against
the terrorism of the renegades in Punjab got to do with corporate manipulations
and Hindu agenda?
Elsewhere Ms.Roy has opined that Kashmir was never a part of
India. Can she tell what is India and when did the concept of India come about?
She must be aware that the political India is an idea of the nationalist
movement and a post-colonial metamorphosis, a fact. Nowhere on the planet has a
country been demarcated and fenced soon after creation of the planet by the
Lord as believers would like to believe? Nations evolve. Social, natural,
political and historical factors play much part in the evolution of a country.
Is Ms. Roy endorsing the British cunning in leaving what was called India to
fend for herself by drafting a very crafty instrument of partition and exit
where in the six hundred odd princely states where given the choice to join the
two nations or stay independent? Yes indeed the country was partitioned on
communal lines and the rulers of the tiny kingdoms were free to join the Indian
Union or the country formed on communal and theocratic ideology-Pakistan. Going
by that yard stick there was nothing irregular in the ruler of Kashmir opting
for the Indian union. If Ms.Roy argues that the Muslim majority states must go
to Pakistan based on the communal partition agenda then what right did the Nizam
have in staying aloof with Hyderabad – a Hindu majority State? And again no
sane man or a practitioner of State craft would want a recalcitrant and
belligerent little kingdom in its midst, which Hyderabad could have potently
become? Is she not aware of the atrocities of Nizam –post independence and the
large-scale forced conversion of Hindus to Islam?
As for Goa where she claims that India fought its own
Christian population, one can only laugh at her silliness. Post World War -2
the colonial structures all over the world disintegrated. And what right did
the obstinate Portuguese have to stay in Goa with their anachronistic colonial dispensation?
Moreover, is Ms.Roy not aware of the nationalist movement in Goa that was in
sync with the freedom movement all across the sub-continent? Her argument may
even serve to smear the nationalist movements against the East India Co and
the British rule in India!
The then US President John.F.Kennedy said denouncing the
Indian action in Goa, “the preacher has been caught coming out of the brothel”.
Their representative to the UN branded India the colonial aggressor. Ironically,
Ms. Roy seems to be echoing those sentiments fifty years after.
Yes the criminals and thugs sponsored by the Congress were
unleashed in Delhi after Indira Gandhi’s killing. They wrecked the most
dastardly communal frenzy upon the hapless Sikhs. But what went about in Punjab
in the early 1980s and the Frankenstein that Sikh religious frenzy created (apparently
aided by self-serving politicians themselves) was Kafkaesque that could have
snowballed into a greater disaster. Tactically the Indian government erred when
they sent the army into the Golden temple when they could have smoked the
terrorists out. But that was no war against the Sikhs.
The matter of the north eastern states is far more critical
when it comes to the process of nation building. With diverse regional and
tribal loyalties it was a herculean task to integrate the minds than the land
into the Union. Ms.Roy must be also aware of the long years that it took for
the integration of the fifty states into the Union and federation of America.
There was in the years since independence resistance from tribes and regional
outfits in the north east which snow balled into insurgency and conflict with
the Indian State and the army was deployed. There has been covert and not so
secret logistical and material support to the insurgents from across the border
too. The historical separation of the north east during the colonial period
created problems for the national formation and integration post-independence.
In the north east a sense of incompatibility grew into resentment and being
made a part of the union especially when the Indian government cold shouldered
local aspirations.
Ms. Roy should
understand that it is not the Hindu corporate agenda that brought about as she alleges
military action in Goa, Hyderabad, Kashmir, Punjab and the North East, but matters
that are diverse. The shortsighted vision of successive governments in New
Delhi has contributed to the alienation of Kashmiris, but that is a different
story. Pray what is wrong in Punjab now? While in North East the internecine
animosities among tribes and their regional loyalties may have to be grappled
with for more years while nation building.
What does Ms. Roy subscribe- a perpetually unstable cauldron
of tribal, ethnic and regional loyalties at logger heads like in Afghanistan or
an evolutionary process of nation building. Or is she still voicing the
colonial mindset that should bring back the Portuguese to Goa, the Dutch to the
Coromandel, the Danes to Tranquebar, the British East India Co back to Calcutta and we still will have to
find some space for the Spaniards.
Erudition, knowledge and the courage to articulate it earnestly
and candidly is indeed a splendid gift. But using those special qualities to
spread innuendo, corner pats in the back, some acclaim and applause in elitist
arenas is tawdry.
