Most of us will have had the misfortune to live disgusting
moments watching folks flaunt their wealth- writing away cheques to the Church,
other religious and charitable endowments. Their face mulched with haughtiness,
moue and with glee. A certain satisfaction would writ in their face and
comforts their mind coming to think that the apparent act of benevolence would
cocoon them from nemesis. Further it is the adulation that comes when the act
of munificence is publicised. Finally, the thought of the eulogies that would
be incessantly read out in memorial services after they are gone! They will
enjoy the vainglory even as they lay putrefacient in their graves! The
philanthropists!
Philanthropy as practiced often shamelessly is as lascivious
as philandering. I just cannot tell between the two, see any difference. Both are
indulged in, one to satisfy the ego and the later gagging. And some folks do
both.
However some are different and this guy is quite different.
He cannot be called a philanthropist, because he doesn’t think that giving is
the ultimate act of charity. In fact, he believes that the act of giving must
make a substantial change in the life of the receiver. Failing which it is just
an empty act like the ostensible statutory reservation that is provided to
socially backward people in education and jobs in government.
Going back to his tale of riches from an ordinary middle
class existence some twenty five odd years ago one feels envious and at the
same time awe. He told me about the specter of future staring without bating
its eyes. He was married and the young bride and he were travelling by train
from Vizag to Kerala precariously perched on top of their steel trunks that
held their belongings inside an overcrowded, smelly second class compartment.
The future looked bleak. He was out of job and was not certain if he could collect
the small capital that two of his friends suggested he bring so that they could
begin a venture. The only source of income was the job his wife had as the
teacher in a government owned Engineering college. It was then quite meager, but handy nevertheless and very vital.
From there, in a while life took a turn that he and his wife could
not fathom. The business that he began with his partners flourished and
exponentially too. Within a few years they spread overseas. A new life with remarkable
shift, riches and money flowing in copiously and it continues. It is indeed
different in a rich man’s world he would say later.It seemed almost like little Alice falling down the rabbit hole into a wonderland.
Now in the mid fifties he opined that matters like success
and money are irrelevant to him. It has been so he says since long. He began practicing
the art of giving after him, one day some fifteen years ago asked his wife
if she really wanted to keep the job she had. Money was no more a necessity for her
to be working. Children were growing and she could probably blend as a home
maker. Besides inquisitive and intrusive opinions were passed in the family and
among friends about her being employed and they alleged too greedy and self serving that she has little time to care for her family. She told him that she would like to
keep the job, not for the money, but because of the passion she has for the profession- for teaching. Then,
the very moment he suggested that she foregoes her monthly pay from the
university and give it to students who are genuinely in need of financial support.
Since that day, he said, it has been fifteen years and she would not touch a
nickel from her pay cheque and personally ensured to credit the bank accounts of
children who were finding it difficult to pay fees and other cost.
That was just one case of his voluntary promotion of human
welfare. He dislikes limelight and as in his own words the left hand shouldn't be told
about what the right gives away.
There is something else besides money that can come to the
aid of people. I saw used that well in him intervening as a good Samaritan and
counselor when hard times and difficult issues almost plowed down the family of
a good friend. Isn’t it so very true that the greatness of a man is not how
much of wealth he acquires, but in his integrity and ability to affect those
around him positively?
The wads of note one throws into the cash pots in places of
worship, the large cheques signed off to prelates, the ostensible charity all
which many do are seldom done out of love for the disadvantaged but as
insurance against the malice and wretchedness that in many cases are their associates
and as a passport to a nonexistent paradise in the netherworld. But there are a
few exceptions, I suppose.
4 comments:
Well articulated Sir ! Couldn't agree with your views more.Yes there indeed are more of the philandering philanthropists than genuine silent unobtrusive good Samaritans who shun publicity and recognition of any kind.
It is a relief to read your well written post. To know that such people exists in our world. One may never be able to reach such levels but these souls can inspire one to try..
Thank you..
Such people are the gem of the society,but some percentage of other charities also bring a change in the society. The earlier adage of one hand not knowing....I feel its better to tell because many people get the idea..for example a very small thing,I always go to a particular orphanage, and when I told this to my friends, they also like the idea and they are also going there, and so in whatevr little way but that orphanage got the benefit..
@ Ramakrishnan Ramanathan
Thanks for the comment.I'm afraid you are now a rare visitor to the blogs.
@ Happy Kitten,
Thanks you.Indeed we may think that some people do give a ray of hope in this most hopeless world. They do , yet.
@ Renu,
Yes indeed.Thanks
Post a Comment