It is often
quite true that empathy is nonexistent in a person or hard to come by because
he or she may not have been through a situation to feel the scars desolation can bring about. But at the same time what distinguishes or what we daringly
claim to distinguish man from beasts is empathy! The feeling for and oneness
with a fellow being! I firmly believe so. Yet often we are found barren,
indifferent smug and abounding in or given to pompous or aphoristic moralising.
Ironically some video footage that are viral on the NET from the wilderness of
Africa tell us that beasts sometimes outflank man in empathy and acts of
compassion.
Yesterday a
few of us got together at home and we chanced upon a discussion on the trauma
of child abuse and the indelible scars that
it leaves upon the person as he or she moves
through adult hood and even late in life.
A few things
became apparently reinforced to me from the argument we had. Men are men like
the clichéd quote of some idiotic politician, “boys’ are boys” while commenting
callously on sexual violence against women. Indeed men are men that (may be
with some exceptions, mercifully)! But the vast majority regardless of their
education and sophistication are egocentric chauvinistic porcine.
Is it not
true about people confiding their deepest mind to even a comparative stranger
or a new acquaintance, even traumatic experiences and thoughts which they
otherwise bear like dark menacing shadows in the farthest corners of their
minds? Is it not true that friendships develop early in life and is it not also
a fact that bonds that develop in later life may stay stronger than a bond
through years of familiarity from the cradle? One fellow was so sure that such
a thing as confiding one’s deepest secret and very personal matter is
inappropriate and suspecting and that it belittles the person and her or his
acceptance as a decent human being. Utterly,utterly obnoxious thought,I argued.
“Who among
you would arise from a severe traumatic beating very early in childhood and
then look life in the face?” I asked the women folk. I explained seeing their
confused faces. I rammed it in further. They had to nod their head in utter
disbelief when I narrated. But then was it not rather naïve and foolish to
disclose that to another person and worst of all one’s spouse- husband? This is
where the male chauvinism and hypocrisy boils over, one that I mentioned
earlier. Worst of all women endorse the right of the man to be offended and
rattled by the news of the abused childhood of his spouse. Utterly shameful I
had to say, particularly in a moment when his understanding and acceptance
would serve as panacea for the years of mental trauma and profound horror she was
plowed under. But that is not to be and men are men and boys are boys. It
sucks!
It takes courage
and that deserts most men and women to be honest with the new people in their
life about their past, to admit the
trauma of their abuse as part of what makes them who they are rather than
trying to enshroud like it’s something
to be dishonoured and penitent about. That is
potently honourable and courageous! “A frank brave heart she has triumphed over
pain and set a courageous example by leading her safely out of the dark
stalking shadows of her abuse." Some women cannot understand that any man
could accept the courage and perseverance of a woman, whereas they seem to be
more comfortable with the existence of a spouse who would be enraged and offended
by the unveiling of the abused past of the woman and his relating virtue of the
bride to her virginity. Is it not natural for men to be so? To be piqued by
such a past? A trite and a pity I was indignant!
The
epilogue- “by calling herself Cinderella she is standing her ground. This isn’t
a girl running to a man to be rescued. This is a girl saying here I’m scars and
all take it or leave it, but don’t expect me to be something that I’m not. A
fairy tale can’t get more empowering! Cinderella is without a future and
resigned to her fate only until she finds the courage to stand up to her
abuser, her stepmother. Once Cinderella decides to try and attend the ball,
when she realises her worth of a better life, that she doesn’t have to live
this way, then amazing things begin to happen before the prince even enters her
life.”
The story of
the ever present prince is just the extended narrative of male priggery and
chauvinism. For it is fed to us no Cinderella shall be complete without the chocolate
faced rubicund charming young Knight or a Prince on a horse back!
Yet what is
ignored is the Prince bewitched by an evil spell cast on him and transformed to
a toad, could break the spell and regain his form as the charming prince only when
the beautiful princes kissed him and broke the spell. Yet this narrative and
its ideal is lost in the wilderness of what is our society.
No comments:
Post a Comment