I think
genesis of an idea or a philosophy is greatly influenced by the age and time in
which it is born. As much as a child who’s growing up, his outlook, vision of
life, his morality and ethics are determined by the circumstances into which he
was born and importantly how he was raised. Don’t you think so?
I some cases
a turbulent incident and or experience can influence a person without bounds and
change the course of his or her life. Like it probably did to the lives of
Gautama Buddha and the Mauryan beacon- Emperor Ashoka and in recent history to
Mohandas Gandhi.
It is also true
that a religion like Communism was born out of the socio-economic conditions of
an age. But its application in society in as violent a way as it was applied
in the Czarist Russia or even in the Pol Pot’s Cambodia, paved way for its
eventual demise in those societies. It is a glaring fact that history often repeats, but Man
seldom notice – that violence begets violence and, “He that troubleth his own
house shall inherit the wind: and the fool shall be servant to the wise of
heart”( Proverb 11.30).
Though an
irreligious person, I have been fascinated by Christ (not the Christ that the
Church has electroplated as she want), but the Christ- he may have been a mere
mortal, the son of God (figuratively speaking) or the son of God, a man who
extolled virtue, nonviolence and urged masses to rebel silently within and exhorted
the marginalised to do so, so that a skewed and unjust socio- economic system was
addressed and changed. He eventually paid with his life like some others in
later history, who dared to articulate- a loner, a lone voice in a frenzied
mob.
I feel Christ
was perhaps the first communist and not Karl Marx, who was more of an economist
expanding on probable panacea for economic and social ills and also borrowing from the philosophy of Christ. It
was strange aberration and a painful one that his (Christ’s) acolytes in later
days indulged in the most heinous acts to preach and spread his philosophy
around the globe. But then that scorched chapter became a ugly history after
the age of the Inquisitions. I think, now no one who has admiration for Christ would exhort the archaic dictum of, “an eye for an eye, a tooth
for a tooth”, even against the most extreme provocation. If this does not
suggest the thought behind the genesis of Christ’s philosophy, the humanistic ring
around its genesis, what else does it tell? Whereas a violent birth and a
violent childhood is sure to bring forth violent existence!
I have now
spent more than a year in a society, a land which is by far open and free, when
compared to some of the countries in the neighbourhood who are grossly
obscurantists and intolerant. Most of them are conforming to remnants of tribal
laws and culture from the medieval ages, when tribal customs, archaic and
unjust laws, belief in sorcery and its use to create fear of the supernatural,
internecine wars and intrigues, horrendous cruelty on the losers and dissenters
were all as common as the sun rise and sun set. Faith and philosophies born out
of such times continue to be as primitive as it can be. Though people live in the
absolute comfort aided by the advancement of science and technology coming out
of Western scientific temper and thought, they seem to be still marooned in the
dark ages as far as intellect, custom and beliefs go. Faith in violence, still
is in the core of their nuclei.
If someone
told me that I represent a country of apostates and who are pagans and with beliefs
in strange and false gods, I would either try to enlighten him on his lack of
knowledge or ignore the comment in total. For if someone calls you a jackass,
unless you doubt you are one why react or show a violent dissent?
A few days
ago I was privy to a strange custom that was enacted outside my apartment. A
house of god as one may call it, flocked by a sect of people situates across the road.
The ten day long festivities began and for the first eight days I was curious,
to begin with and then began to enjoy the congregation that came at night time,
the drums and the songs they sang. It reminded of those temple and church
festivities back home. Then on the ninth night and tenth morning it was in my
understanding bizarre and macabre enacting of a strange and repulsive ritual.
Scores of youth lining on either side clad in white, wailing, flagellating with
flails and soon they were drenched in their own blood. The morning ritual was with menacing swords
slashing themselves, their torso and head. The young fellows seemed to flaunt.
Blood was flowing from head to heel down their torsos, the white clothing a
distant thing! The bizarre melee was their way of venerating a historical
figure who they considered as the ordained chieftain of the faithful’s and who
was brutally killed in the battle by renegades of the same faith.
Later that
afternoon I walked an alley down and for the first time I knew the stench of
human blood. It was nauseating and morbid air.
I wondered how haloed would this bloodletting and infliction of pain can
ever be? If reverence to the martyr and commemoration of martyrdom was the observance then those
folks could have enmasse gone to a medical facility and donated blood.
That would have been a great act of reverence and worshipful than this ghoulish
ritual. But!