It is one
thing to pat oneself on the back and proclaim that one is a pontiff of sorts;
one is on a greater moral and ethical plateau than the ordinary denizens and
even one’s spouse, children and friends. But it is a different matter to be
humble to not proclaim oneself as the infallible, moralist hero. The pleasure one
may sense by this sententious being and when patting on the back is narcosis and
the state, narcissism-more so when an image of the wronged is created. This is
not a liability found in the elite of the society or the celebrities who are
caught with their trousers down, with foot in their mouth; it is also seen much
amongst us ordinary souls.
Cheating on
oneself is more dissolute than cheating on your spouse or the world itself. I
do not know what would be for instance in the mind of Louis Armstrong now. Reading
his autobiography, “It is not about Cycling”, I was impressed by the raw
courage and perseverance he displayed from a terminally sick stage and come
back into the world to inspire awe by winning the most grueling physically
exerting sport, the “Tour de France”. I’m sure he would have felt empty within
even when he proclaimed that he was wronged and unfairly handled or even when
he wore the Yellow jersey of the winner of the tour seven times.
But Armstrong
just happens to be another human being who perhaps led himself to be deluded. This
deluding happens every day amongst many.
But I think
not about deception perse as seen in the case of, say a Tiger Woods or an
Armstrong. It is about the character we generally display to the world, the
image that we create for public consumption and with some, for comfort of hallucination.
What I’m, is best told by my spouse and my children. Mothers may be prejudiced
in favour of their child. But I guess the wife/husband or the children may be
forthcoming and candid. So what we are is best known from our spouse and kids.
This is especially true in case of folks who claim a higher ground for themselves
in character, outlook even in mundane or seemingly trivial matters. A person
who champions in public the cause of women’s emancipation and equal treatment
may be the most cantankerous and quibbling man at home. A man or woman who
exhibits the air of a perfect partner may be the artist of malarkey and ruse
back home. These fantastic revelations are closed circuited inside the walls of
the house and privy to the spouse and the kids only. Some of them can be even misogynist.
I have known
a close relative whose promiscuity was deftly covered up by his spouse all the
while when she was alive. But it was shockingly made aware to me after her
death, his profane indulgence with women and his disregard for his conduct
being known to his teen aged daughters. When she was alive he used to assault
his wife provoked by his temper and the matter seldom seeped through the walls
of the house. He retired from a powerful position with a multi- national company.
He was seen and known as a disciplinarian, a gentleman, an unfortunate bereaved,
loving husband and affectionate father!
There are
some who thrive by blaming the spouse, usually the wife. The image they create
to the outer world is that of the gentleman, the tolerant and loving husband, a
person who has much forbearance and patience with his spouse. It is a revelation
that is opposite that we get to see if the wife chose to talk. Such people are
always enjoying the image of the wronged.
It is true
that we can find specimen in all matters in the society we live. This person a
woman was a termagant - cantankerous and emotionally debilitating in attitude
and conduct towards her husband that he was driven into alcoholism. His was not
a case of silly excuses and self-justification to hit the bottle. He chose to drown
himself in the trickery that inebriation and over dose of alcohol provides. Well
his wife was in fact an image of friendliness and the wronged.
Why do I say
so much? Because it is mentally comforting to have the image of what you are, of what your spouse or children would define you as.When you know you are a semi-outlaw and a fallible,
an ordinary mortal who will stumble,who is not above infractions but moves on, rather than a contrived wax image of moralist and the
wronged.
11 comments:
Wax! A perfect title! A new perspective of decievers around.
Ahh Anil.. you force us all to look at ourselves! Who am I?
In fact this is a question that me and Hubby ask each other in jest almost everyday. We try to answer it in different ways but in reality it was always a moment for me to introspect.
Very intetseting.
I would like to see how does a couple address this.
I think your last paragraph says it all, well written, you have given me much to think about.
It may not be highly desirable to know that one’s gods have feet of clay; nevertheless, knowing matters. Period.
Whatever various investigations reveal, I am still a fan of Armstrong, and feel deeply inspired by him.
And yes, there are many couples living, pretending to be everything which they actually are not.
@ NRIGirl,
Thanks. Yes I believe that we all have a side that is seldom seen outside. We consciously do not mirror it.
@ Happy Kitten,
A, all of us have element of hypocrisy and we consciously do not exhibit our true self. We are eloquent about what we are not.
For instance there are people who dislike women, that they even detest all female of species, even animals. But to the outside world they parade fascinating affection for the girl child. This is just one tiny aspect of how different people can display and talk about. Why? I do not know.
What I'm perhaps can be best told by my wife my kids.
Don't you think so?
@ BK Chowla
Yes I wish to see that too. I think in many there will be mutual recriminations than a genuine account of their spouses.
@ Petty Witter,
Thanks. I'm not that bad ehhh haa!! Not good certainly, but not very bad.
@ Arun Meethale Chirakkal,
Yes you are right.
@ rama,
I wish that the findings of the investigators were erroneous. I wish to see Armstrong come clean. But if wishes can be horses and horses can fly!!!! It seems to be the cul de sac for Armstrong.
It is just not about couples, it is about the tendency to pontificate and idolize oneself while the truth is not very helping. Everyone has fallibilities , but the conscious effort to parade a puritan and idealistic image is rather vulgar.
What you said is correct. Some people wear a mask of gentleness in front of others. true essence may be different.
@rudraprayag
thanks for the comments.More than often we don masks.
Once an image is created it is very difficult to break out of it. It takes a lot of courage to break any perception that the world might have of you, and stand straight just the way you are with all your scars and deformities. But once that is attained, there is no greater peace.
@ Sujata,
Why show courage and be stupid to break out of the carefully cultivated facade?
The shallowness of claiming the higher ground when we know that we are just ordinary!!!
Post a Comment